Eric Schiffer, a California-based entrepreneur and chairman of Reputation Management Consultants, told Fox Business that Proposition 40—a ballot measure proposing a wealth tax on California residents with net worth exceeding $1 billion—would produce a "giant sucking sound" of business exits from the state. Schiffer's warning echoes a pattern visible in 2023 relocation data, when California saw a net outflow of 352,000 residents, the highest in any state that year.
Proposition 40, if passed, would impose an annual levy of 1.5% on worldwide assets above the billion-dollar threshold, with collection enforced even after relocation through an exit tax mechanism lasting ten years. The measure's backers project $21.6 billion in annual revenue, earmarked for housing, healthcare, and climate initiatives. Opponents note that California already derives 42% of its income tax revenue from the top 1% of earners, creating acute vulnerability to high-net-worth departures. The state comptroller's office recorded a $68 billion budget deficit in fiscal 2024, partially attributed to capital gains volatility among ultra-wealthy taxpayers.
The warning arrives as Florida, Texas, and Nevada report material increases in registered family offices and new business formations tied to California relocations. Florida's Office of Economic and Demographic Research documented 916 new family offices registered in 2023, up 31% year-over-year, with 63% of new registrants listing prior California residency. Texas Comptroller data shows 74 California-based companies with revenue exceeding $50 million re-domiciled to the state in the same period, bringing an estimated 18,400 jobs. Schiffer's point—that taxing unrealized gains on illiquid holdings forces fire-sales or borrowing against equity positions—aligns with SFO treasurer concerns about forced liquidations in private company stakes, real estate portfolios, and venture positions that cannot be marked to market daily.
The proposition's exit tax structure operates as a ten-year clawback on wealth accumulated while a California resident, calculated annually on the departure date net worth figure. Legal challenges to similar measures in other jurisdictions have centered on interstate commerce clause violations and unconstitutional restraint on migration, though no U.S. state has successfully implemented a billionaire-specific wealth tax at scale. Allocators should track Q2 2025 revision to California's revenue forecast, the attorney general's official title and summary release for Proposition 40 expected in late March, and any pre-filing domicile shifts among the state's 186 billionaires before the measure reaches the November ballot.
The entrepreneur's comment arrives three weeks after Elon Musk completed his personal and Tesla operational relocation to Texas, a move the company disclosed would eliminate $1.2 billion in annual California tax liability across personal income and business taxes. Whether Proposition 40 accelerates or merely formalizes an existing trend will depend on signature-gathering success and whether financial advisors to ultra-wealthy clients recommend preemptive domicile changes before any legislative clock starts. The California Legislative Analyst's Office releases its formal fiscal impact statement for the proposition in April.