NYU legal scholars published a 65-page working paper this week recommending that the Internal Revenue Service classify sports event contracts traded on prediction market platforms as gambling winnings, subjecting them to 24% mandatory withholding and Form W-2G reporting. The timing arrives as the Fifth and D.C. Circuit Courts of Appeals have reached opposing conclusions on whether the Commodity Futures Trading Commission holds regulatory authority over event contracts, creating a clean circuit split likely headed for Supreme Court review.
The paper, authored by tax professors at NYU's School of Law, argues that sports outcome contracts—where users buy shares priced between $0.01 and $0.99 based on event probability—function identically to wagers under existing IRC Section 165(d) precedent. Platforms including Kalshi and PredictIt currently report user gains as miscellaneous income on 1099-MISC forms, treating profits as investment returns rather than gambling proceeds. That classification allows users to deduct trading losses against other income and avoid the $600 threshold that triggers automatic withholding on casino and sportsbook payouts.
The regulatory uncertainty stems from contradictory September rulings. The Fifth Circuit upheld Kalshi's right to list congressional election contracts, determining the CFTC exceeded its statutory authority by blocking event markets not explicitly tied to agricultural commodities or economic indices. Three weeks later, the D.C. Circuit sided with the CFTC in a separate case involving PredictIt's political markets, affirming the agency's broad mandate to prevent gambling under the guise of derivatives trading. The Fifth Circuit decision has since allowed Kalshi to process $2.3B in notional volume across sports, political, and entertainment event contracts in the fourth quarter alone, a 340% increase over Q3.
For league operators, the tax classification question carries second-order sponsor and media implications. If the IRS adopts the NYU framework, prediction market platforms would face the same compliance infrastructure costs as licensed sportsbooks—roughly $4.2M annually for a mid-scale operator, according to American Gaming Association filings. That expense narrows the structural advantage prediction markets currently hold over traditional sports betting in states where regulatory fees and promotional tax deductions make licensed books operate at negative 18-22% hold margins during customer acquisition phases. Sponsors currently treating prediction market integrations as financial-data partnerships rather than gambling affiliations would need to reassess disclosure requirements, particularly in jurisdictions where gambling advertising remains restricted.
The circuit split also affects franchise valuation models in emerging markets. Investment committees sizing ownership stakes in leagues considering prediction market data partnerships—MLS, NWSL, and Liga MX have each held exploratory talks with Kalshi since August—are now pricing in 12-18 month regulatory timelines before the Supreme Court hears the consolidated case, according to two family office allocators who spoke on background. That delay compresses the window for leagues to negotiate exclusive data rights before the tax treatment hardens. One sports-focused PE principal noted his fund has paused diligence on a $180M NWSL minority stake until the IRS issues guidance, citing uncertainty over whether prediction market revenue would fall under existing gambling-revenue escrow requirements in sponsorship deals.
The NYU paper stops short of recommending the CFTC defer entirely to state gambling regulators, instead proposing a dual-oversight model where event contracts are taxed as wagers but regulated as commodity derivatives for market manipulation and insider trading purposes. That structure would require platforms to register as both money services businesses under FinCEN and gambling operators under state compact authorities—a compliance burden Kalshi's general counsel called "functionally prohibitive" in a December filing.
Watch for the Solicitor General's office to file a cert petition by late Q2, consolidating the Fifth and D.C. Circuit cases for the Court's October 2026 term. The IRS typically waits for Supreme Court resolution before issuing revenue rulings on novel financial instruments, meaning current tax treatment will likely remain in legal limbo through the 2026 filing season. Meanwhile, Kalshi has quietly hired four former CFTC enforcement attorneys since November, and PredictIt's parent company has retained Gibson Dunn for Supreme Court briefing.
The $2.3B in Q4 volume signals institutional appetite is already treating the Fifth Circuit framework as settled law, regardless of what the D.C. Circuit said three weeks later.
The takeaway
Sports prediction market tax treatment remains undefined as circuit split heads to Supreme Court, freezing league data partnerships and sponsor diligence.
Editorial & Disclosure Notice: This article was written with artificial intelligence from public sources and is published without individual human review. Artificial intelligence and other digital tools are also used for research, analysis, editing, formatting, and production. Errors, omissions, outdated information, or inaccuracies may occur. References to companies, brands, products, services, organizations, or individuals are for informational and editorial purposes and do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, partnership, or approval unless expressly stated. All trademarks and other intellectual property remain the property of their respective owners. Opinions, analysis, estimates, and commentary are informational only and should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax, medical, procurement, or other professional advice. Information may be corrected, clarified, or updated after publication. Corrections or removal requests: jenny@pops4.com.
Want the 60-second program for your specific event?
Enter your event and email — we build it and send the branded proposal before lunch. No obligation.
The branded-identity layer Chiefs of Staff and heritage CMOs route through — your name imprinted on real authorized stock, your pick of 200+ brands and 70,000 products, shipped from one accountable house. Nine editorial desks publish the intelligence those operators read before they sign.
200+authorized brands
70,000products · virtual proof on each
9 deskspublishing daily
1997one house, since
70,000 SKUs · virtual proof in 60 seconds · no platform fee · blind-shipped · ASI #217876
Your next customer won't visit your website. Their AI will.
AI assistants have quietly taken over the first step of buying — they answer from catalogs they can read and shortlist whoever can actually ship. Two questions now decide whether you exist to that buyer: can a machine read your catalog, and can you fulfill the order. Most brands fail one or both and never find out why the orders went elsewhere. The winners of this shift aren't the loudest. They're the most readable. Build for the machine that's about to do the shopping.
Built by the craft floor — apparel, media, packaging, and secure print.
This trade runs on hands, not desks. Imprint manufacturing & Komori heritage press through approved vendors · Canon high-speed secure-media operations is a craft floor — genuine Six Sigma discipline applied to ink, thread, foil, and registration, where a hundredth of an inch is the difference between a brand that reads serious and one that reads cheap. POPS4 is built by exactly those operators: independent, boots-on-the-ground engineers who carry their own book, read a client in microseconds, and put their name on every run. Beyond our own Virginia Beach floor, we work with a vetted network of craft manufacturers across the US — each meeting the highest excellence in QC standards in the industry, each a specialist in its own discipline — so apparel, hard-goods imprinting, media manufacturing, packaging, and secure printing all go to the bench built for them, coordinated from one accountable hub. Short-run from twenty-five units, volume to five hundred thousand. Two hundred authorized national brands, seventy thousand SKUs with virtual proofing on every one. Art archived for instant reorders. Net-thirty corporate terms, NDA-standard white-label — your name on the work, or none at all.
Strategy, positioning, identity, creative, and messaging — wired into an AI system that publishes and distributes on its own. Nine editorial desks generate the authority, the production house ships the physical proof, and the attribution layer tells you which post sold which SKU. What you get is an operating layer — content, catalog, and order path under one roof — that keeps working whether or not you are in the room. Built for principals who would rather own the machine than rent the agency.
Named-account programs — one desk, quiet delivery, NDA-standard.
One point of contact who already knows the file, so nothing restarts from zero between engagements. The work ships blind, under NDA, with your name on it or none at all. Built for single-family offices, heritage-house CMOs, sports-ownership groups, and the agencies that white-label our production. The relationship is the product; the merch is the proof of it.
SFO · Chief of Staff desk. Principal household, properties, aircraft, yacht, calendar, philanthropy — one file.
Shop seventy thousand products. Virtual proof on every one. 24/7.
Drop your logo on any product and see the virtual proof before asking. Quote routes direct to the desk. MCP catalog for AI agents. Celeste for the fast conversation. Full self-service checkout in development.