McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown sent a formal letter to the FIA raising competitive equity concerns about team ownership structures on the current Formula 1 grid. The letter, confirmed by multiple paddock sources this week, questions whether certain teams operate under relationships that blur independence—the so-called A/B team problem—and whether existing governance mechanisms adequately police those arrangements. Brown's move lands as the sport fields eleven applications for two expansion slots and as private equity stakes proliferate across existing teams.
Brown's letter does not name specific teams but addresses structural questions around technical partnerships, shared personnel, and common ownership ties that may compromise competitive independence. The FIA's International Sporting Code prohibits a single entity from holding a "substantial influence" over multiple teams, but enforcement has historically been light. Haas and Ferrari share wind tunnel access and gearbox supply; AlphaTauri operates as Red Bull's second team with shared technical director appointments until the Racing Bulls rebrand; Aston Martin recently hired former Red Bull aero chief Dan Fallows. Brown's letter asks where the line sits and who draws it.
The timing is deliberate. Formula 1 Management and the FIA are evaluating expansion bids—Andretti Global backed by $200 million in Cadillac branding commitments remains the most visible—and those decisions hinge on demonstrating competitive legitimacy. If the grid already contains teams operating under undisclosed cooperative agreements, new entrants face questions about whether they compete on merit or subsidy. Brown's letter effectively asks the FIA to clarify the rules before adding teams, not after.
The ownership question also touches valuation. McLaren sold a minority stake to MSP Sports Capital in 2020 at a $560 million valuation; Aston Martin's ownership recapitalization by Lawrence Stroll implied a team enterprise value near $1 billion; Alpine is currently fielding expressions of interest from private equity groups with bids rumored north of €800 million. If some teams benefit from off-balance-sheet technical support or cost-sharing with sister operations, those valuations reflect competitive positions that may not be replicable under stricter ownership governance. Family offices and institutional allocators pricing franchise stakes need clarity on what they are buying.
Brown's letter also carries political weight inside the paddock. McLaren sits on the F1 Commission alongside Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull, and Alpine as one of five permanent team representatives. Brown's willingness to formalize concerns in writing signals that at least one major stakeholder believes the current governance posture is untenable. The letter does not demand immediate rule changes but requests that the FIA publish transparent criteria for what constitutes impermissible common influence and commit to regular audits. The request is mild in language, sharp in implication: the FIA has been asleep.
The FIA has not publicly responded. President Mohammed Ben Sulayem has spent the past eighteen months navigating disputes over cost cap enforcement, technical directive appeals, and his own governance authority after a messy attempt to remove race director Niels Wittich mid-season. A fight over team ownership structures adds a third front. The FIA's compliance department, already stretched on cost cap audits, would need additional resources to conduct ownership reviews—and those reviews would require teams to disclose technical agreements, personnel contracts, and board-level relationships that most prefer to keep quiet.
Meanwhile, the expansion decision clock is ticking. FOM CEO Stefano Domenicali has said the grid will not expand unless new entrants add value beyond the existing $1.137 billion sport enterprise fund distributed to teams. Andretti's bid includes General Motors backing and a promise to build a U.S. manufacturing base, but competing teams have questioned whether a new entrant dilutes prize money without adding commensurate commercial value. Brown's letter reframes that debate: if the current grid contains teams that share technical capacity, expansion may restore competitive balance rather than dilute it.
The next flashpoint is the March F1 Commission meeting, where expansion bids and governance items traditionally appear on the agenda. Brown will attend. So will the team principals whose ownership structures his letter implicitly questions. The FIA has the option to publish ownership criteria before that meeting or wait until after the expansion decision, when any new rules would apply only to future entrants. Brown's letter makes waiting harder to justify.
One paddock executive, speaking off the record, said the letter is less about Haas or AlphaTauri than about establishing precedent before a $500 million sovereign wealth fund stake appears in a team with quiet technical ties to another. That has not happened yet. Brown is making sure the FIA cannot claim surprise when it does.
The takeaway
Brown's FIA letter forces governance clarity before expansion decisions lock in team structures private equity will price for a decade.
formula1governanceownershipmclarenfiaexpansion
Brand your brand — for real
70,000 products · virtual proof in 60 seconds · no platform fee · imprinted since 1997
Two hundred brands. Eight months on the desk. $0.003 an impression.
The branded-identity layer Chiefs of Staff and heritage CMOs route through — imprinting on real authorized stock for Nike, YETI, Patagonia, The North Face, Carhartt, Stanley, Peter Millar, TUMI, Montblanc, Moleskine, Waterford, and 190 more. Nine editorial desks publish the intelligence those operators read before they sign: The Stash Edge, Markets Edge, Sports Edge, Voyage Edge, Black's Edge, House Edge, the Article Engine, Ramen, and Fending.
$0.003per impression · vs ~$0.007 digital CPM
8 monthson the desk · vs 0.8s for a digital ad
200+authorized brands · Nike · YETI · Patagonia
9 deskspublishing daily · since 1997
70,000 SKUs · virtual proof in 60 seconds · no platform fee · blind-shipped · ASI #217876
Your next customer won't visit your website. Their AI will.
AI assistants have quietly taken over the first step of buying — they answer from catalogs they can read and shortlist whoever can actually ship. Two questions now decide whether you exist to that buyer: can a machine read your catalog, and can you fulfill the order. Most brands fail one or both and never find out why the orders went elsewhere. The winners of this shift aren't the loudest. They're the most readable. Build for the machine that's about to do the shopping.
Built by the craft floor — apparel, media, packaging, and secure print.
This trade runs on hands, not desks. Imprint manufacturing & Komori Press · Canon high-speed secure-media operations is a craft floor — genuine Six Sigma discipline applied to ink, thread, foil, and registration, where a hundredth of an inch is the difference between a brand that reads serious and one that reads cheap. POPS4 is built by exactly those operators: independent, boots-on-the-ground engineers who carry their own book, read a client in microseconds, and put their name on every run. Beyond our own Virginia Beach floor, we work with a vetted network of craft manufacturers across the US — each meeting the highest excellence in QC standards in the industry, each a specialist in its own discipline — so apparel, hard-goods imprinting, media manufacturing, packaging, and secure printing all go to the bench built for them, coordinated from one accountable hub. Short-run from twenty-five units, volume to five hundred thousand. Two hundred authorized national brands, seventy thousand SKUs with virtual proofing on every one. Art archived for instant reorders. Net-thirty corporate terms, NDA-standard white-label — your name on the work, or none at all.
Strategy, positioning, identity, creative, and messaging — wired into an AI system that publishes and distributes on its own. Nine editorial desks generate the authority, the production house ships the physical proof, and the attribution layer tells you which post sold which SKU. What you get is an operating layer — content, catalog, and order path under one roof — that keeps working whether or not you are in the room. Built for principals who would rather own the machine than rent the agency.
Named-account programs — one desk, quiet delivery, NDA-standard.
One point of contact who already knows the file, so nothing restarts from zero between engagements. The work ships blind, under NDA, with your name on it or none at all. Built for single-family offices, heritage-house CMOs, sports-ownership groups, and the agencies that white-label our production. The relationship is the product; the merch is the proof of it.
SFO · Chief of Staff desk. Principal household, properties, aircraft, yacht, calendar, philanthropy — one file.
Shop seventy thousand products. Virtual proof on every one. 24/7.
Drop your logo on any product and see the virtual proof before asking. Quote routes direct to the desk. MCP catalog for AI agents. Celeste for the fast conversation. Full self-service checkout in development.